The developer says it will work closely with council officers to understand the £1.9bn city centre project’s latest deferral

Lendlease’s plans for the £1.9bn Smithfield regeneration were deferred by Birmingham City Council again at the end of last week, over concerns about the developer’s proposals for green and open spaces.

2024_uk_smithfield_smithfield-park

Source: Lendlease

A CGI of Smithfield Park

Councillors and local organisations raised objections to the size of a proposed public square and park. The Smithfield redevelopment is expected to deliver 3,000 homes overall.

Councillor Gareth Moore said that what had been put forward so far was “not compliant with either the Birmingham development plan or the masterplan for Smithfield which always envisioned a large-capacity events space as part of that”.

The council officer’s report for the planning committee on Thursday 16 May stated that while the site can currently accommodate a large festival, “there is no planning policy requirement for the square to be of a minimum size or hold any particular events”.

>> See also: Peabody appoints developer to deliver its first Passivhaus scheme

>> See also: Firm behind rejected plans for ‘bonkers’ Birmingham tower to draw up new proposals

The report added that the estimated capacity for events in Manor Square “is not insubstantial”, and would accommodate 6,500-7,000 people.

The council officer also noted that there had been objections to the size and location of Smithfield Park. The CityPark4Brum campaign argued that Smithfield Park “must be much larger” and pointed out that the park Lendlease will deliver in Elephant and Castle is 25% bigger.

The objection highlights that the park falls below the council’s requirement that new residential developments provide new public open space of around two hectares per 1000 people.

Lendlease first lodged its planning application in December 2022, but Historic England said it could not support the proposals stating that it would “harm the historic cityscape but also disturb significant medieval remains”. 

In the revised plans, which were submitted in February this year, Lendlease said that all proposed buildings would be constructed away from an 18th century moat and medieval walls. 

However, the council officer noted that the Smithfield redevelopment is “a very dense city centre proposal, therefore providing these open space requirements on this character of development would make the proposal unviable, as much of the site would be open space and not developable”.

A spokesperson for Lendlease said: “We respect the planning committee’s decision and will now work closely with officers to understand the reasons for a deferral. We look forward to presenting the application again in the near future.”