Housing association says it has acted “in accordance with contract terms” and is confident of winning case in High Court

Home Group has said a contractor’s claim in the High Court that it is owed £7.7m by the housing association is ‘spurious’ and ‘poorly-evidenced’

The 55,000-home association said it has “acted in good faith” on scheme at the centre of the case that completed six years behind schedule.

high court

The housing association which ISG has taken to the High Court over a £7.7m payment dispute has described the contractor’s claims as “spurious to say the least”.

Will Gardner, executive director of asset and development at Home Group said the housing assocation had “acted in good faith” but had “struggled throughout” with ISG on a residential scheme at the centre of the case.

The contractor, which is currently locked in talks over a sale to a South African businessman, was appointed to build the 56-home development on Watford High Street in 2014.

It was expected to take around 16 months to complete, according to Home Group, but instead reached practical completion in 2022, six years behind schedule.

In February this year the housing association issued ISG a “final payment notice” stating that it owed trhe contractor just £718,000 for the works, less than 10% of the £7.7m ISG claims it is due.

But Gardner said Home Group said its price was “in accordance with the agreed contract terms” and its decision to offer the sum was a view “confirmed by the consultants and experts who have supported us on this difficult scheme”.

He added that ISG’s claims for a total of £7,732,481.67 plus interest of 15.25% were “weak and poorly evidenced”.

“We are very confident indeed that we will be able to successfully argue our case,” he said.

“This is a project that was scheduled to take 16 months to complete, but significantly overran. In fact, the development completed six years late.

“We struggled throughout with ISG’s apparent lack of commitment to deliver what we were entitled to. We have acted in good faith throughout this process and have paid a price that is correct and in accordance with the agreed contract terms. This view is confirmed by the consultants and experts who have supported us on this difficult scheme.

“ISG have continued to increase the amounts they suggest we owe despite the scheme completing well over two years ago. We feel their claims and rationale are spurious to say the least. We look forward to putting our case before the court.”

ISG has been contacted for comment.

The case is still live and is understood not to have been settled out of court, although proceedings have now been paused until 18 December because ISG failed to comply with pre-action protocol for engineering and construction disputes before issuing proceedings.

Pre-action protocol requires claimants to write to the defendant with clear details of the claim and why it is being made including a summary of the facts and how much money is being requested.

In a court order issued at the Technology and Construction Court by Justice O’Farrell on 26 July, the two parties are said to have “disagreed” on whether ISG was correct in starting proceedings without complying to the protocol but agreed that the case should be paused.

If the case is not settled outside of court, Home Group is required to file its defence by 29 January 2025.

The case is one of eight which troubled ISG has been involved in since the start of 2024.

The firm’s fit-out business is also the defendant in a breach of contract claim with publishing firm Pearson PLC, while its retail arm is involved in a dispute with facades contractor FK Construction Ltd.

>> See also: Home Group hires new director to enhance customer journeys

>> See also: Turnover and surplus up at Home Group in first nine months of the year

>>See also: Not settling for a quiet life – an interview with Mark Henderson

Last October, ISG Construction was also the subject of a winding up petition, a legal action used by a creditor against a company which owes it £750 or more.

The status of ISG’s potential sale is currently unknown six weeks after the firm’s chairman Matt Roche said the deal would be announced “within days”.

It is understood the hold-up centres on red tape in the US, the base of ISG’s owner Cathexis, under the country’s so-called Know Your Client regulations.

The prospective new owners are understood to have held meetings with senior ISG staff to reassure them the impending sale is on track and to outline their plans for the business.