- News
- Comment
- In Focus
- A fair deal for housing
- Programmes
- Boardroom
- CPD
- Jobs
- Events
2023 events calendar
Explore nowBuilding Awards 2022
Keep up to date
- Product Search
- Subscribe
Trusted media brand of the Chartered Institute of Housing
Trusted media brand of the Chartered Institute of Housing
From this month, all developments will have to show how they increase biodiversity by 10% in order to receive planning permission. Joey Gardiner looks at whether the policy is a win-win or too much too soon
Almost six years after Michael Gove as environment secretary first promised to make protecting the natural world go “hand in hand” with building more homes, the government’s compulsory biodiversity net gain policy will finally be introduced later this month. Under this policy, all development projects will have to ensure that they generate an increase of at least a 10% in biodiversity, either on site or by off-setting.
At the time, Gove said that his biodiversity net gain (BNG) plan, which became enshrined in the 2021 Environment Act, put “the environment at the heart of planning and development”. Now as housing secretary, overseeing its roll-out across the sector, he says it will ensure that developers “enrich local wildlife when delivering new homes and infrastructure”.
Either way, it is hard to underplay its significance to the industry, potentially fundamentally affecting how developers design, landscape, value, manage and market their sites, and adding a big new layer of complexity into the planning process at a time when the system is already buckling under the strain of a resourcing crisis. “It’s something that’s had a fundamental effect on the way we approach sites,” says Neil Beamsley, group head of biodiversity at listed builder Bellway.
…
Already registered? Login here
Stay at the forefront of thought leadership with news and analysis from award-winning journalists. Sign up below to receive:
It takes less than one minute….
… or subscribe for full access - Subscribe now