- News
- Comment
- In Focus
- A fair deal for housing
- Programmes
- Boardroom
- CPD
- Jobs
- Events
2023 events calendar
Explore nowBuilding Awards 2022
Keep up to date
- Product Search
- Subscribe
Trusted media brand of the Chartered Institute of Housing
Trusted media brand of the Chartered Institute of Housing
Almost all the low ‘C3’ grades given by the Regulator of Social Housing since the new regime came into force in April are for local authorities as opposed to housing associations. Carl Brown finds out why
This year a new regime has been installed at Number 10, and at the same time we have seen the introduction of a another type of regime that is revolutionising the world of social housing regulation.
In April the Social Housing (Regulation) Act came into force, ushering in a new period of proactive consumer regulation that amounts to the biggest shake-up of the rules for a generation.
The Regulator of Social Housing (RSH) has begun carrying out its first inspections in more than a decade, as it actively assess providers’ compliance against four revised consumer standards, armed with a suite of new enforcement tools. The “serious detriment” test which restricted regulatory intervention on consumer issues has been consigned to the dustbin.
Anybody looking closely at the gradings so far will have been struck by one fact in particular about the landlords graded ‘C3’, which means there are “serious failings” in their delivery against the consumer standards. Out of the 12 social landlords that have received a ‘C3’ to date, all but one are local authorities (see table below).
Already registered? Login here
Stay at the forefront of thought leadership with news and analysis from award-winning journalists. Sign up below to receive:
It takes less than one minute….
… or subscribe for full access - Subscribe now