- News
- Comment
- In Focus
- A fair deal for housing
- Programmes
- Boardroom
- CPD
- Jobs
- Events
2023 events calendar
Explore nowBuilding Awards 2022
Keep up to date
- Product Search
- Subscribe
Trusted media brand of the Chartered Institute of Housing
Trusted media brand of the Chartered Institute of Housing
Some social landlords describe X as “toxic” but for others it is still a “shop window” and remains an effective route to communicate with residents. As the platform sheds users, Alex Funk looks at how individual landlords are responding
Between 30 July and 7 August this year, an estimated 29 anti-immigration riots took place across the UK in response to the stabbing of three young girls at a dance class in Southport. As far-right groups targeted mosques and asylum centres, social media platform X – formally Twitter – was openly blamed by the authorities for fuelling the violence. Its owner Elon Musk posted that civil war in the UK was “inevitable”.
This saga, along with long-running concerns about the perceived lack of moderation on the platform and debates about its usefulness, has seen millions of users in the UK and abroad stop using their X accounts or deactivate them altogether.
Certainly in the housing sector, since Musk’s $44bn takeover of the platform in April 2022, the worlds-apart ideologies of the richest person on the planet and many who work in social housing have sparked discussions about whether X is still a useful communication tool, or whether it is now more a weapon for hate best avoided.
Already registered? Login here
Stay at the forefront of thought leadership with news and analysis from award-winning journalists. Sign up below to receive:
It takes less than one minute….
… or subscribe for full access - Subscribe now