- News
- Comment
- In Focus
- A fair deal for housing
- Programmes
- Boardroom
- CPD
- Jobs
- Events
2023 events calendar
Explore nowBuilding Awards 2022
Keep up to date
- Product Search
- Subscribe
Trusted media brand of the Chartered Institute of Housing
Trusted media brand of the Chartered Institute of Housing
The Court of Appeal has clarified the criteria by which the secretary of state should make decisions on liability for cladding remediation, and when developers might reasonably challenge them
Due to its infancy, all guidance on the new building safety regime is valuable to the construction industry and the recent decision of the Court of Appeal in R (on the application of Redrow plc) vs Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities [2024] EWCA Civ 651 has generated significant interest. It relates to an application by Redrow for judicial review of the secretary of state’s decision to allocate funds from the Building Safety Fund (BSF) for cladding remediation works on two high-rise buildings in Birmingham and raises issues as to the proper operation of the BSF.
Due to its infancy, all guidance on the new building safety regime is valuable to the construction industry and the recent decision of the Court of Appeal in R (on the application of Redrow plc) vs Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities [2024] EWCA Civ 651 has generated significant interest. It relates to an application by Redrow for judicial review of the secretary of state’s decision to allocate funds from the Building Safety Fund (BSF) for cladding remediation works on two high-rise buildings in Birmingham and raises issues as to the proper operation of the BSF.
…
Already registered? Login here
Stay at the forefront of thought leadership with news and analysis from award-winning journalists. Sign up below to receive:
It takes less than one minute….
… or subscribe for full access - Subscribe now