- News
- Comment
- In Focus
- A fair deal for housing
- Programmes
- Boardroom
- CPD
- Jobs
- Events
2023 events calendar
Explore nowBuilding Awards 2022
Keep up to date
- Product Search
- Subscribe
Trusted media brand of the Chartered Institute of Housing
Trusted media brand of the Chartered Institute of Housing
Those who complain about the government’s decision to tackle the nutrient neutrality impasse have not understood the issue in detail, writes Paul Smith
It is four and a half years since Natural England, in response to a ruling from the European Court of Justice, wrote to local authorities covering the catchment of the River Solent regarding nutrient pollution. It was a letter that was to have significant ramifications for housing supply.
Because the level of nutrient pollution in the river was above legal limits, authorities were told not to grant planning permission for new homes unless developers could prove that they would not increase the amount of nitrate pollution entering the river. That is very difficult – and expensive – to do, often needing farmland to be taken out of production, paying water companies to upgrade their sewage works, or creating large-scale wetland habitats on third-party land to filter out pollutants.
Already registered? Login here
Stay at the forefront of thought leadership with news and analysis from award-winning journalists. Sign up below to receive:
It takes less than one minute….
… or subscribe for full access - Subscribe now