- News
- Comment
- In Focus
- A fair deal for housing
- Programmes
- Boardroom
- CPD
- Jobs
- Events
2023 events calendar
Explore nowBuilding Awards 2022
Keep up to date
- Product Search
- Subscribe
Trusted media brand of the Chartered Institute of Housing
Trusted media brand of the Chartered Institute of Housing
Rather than procedural change to drive the illusion of improvement, we should completely re-assess what planners need to be doing, argues Paul Smith
After spending almost a year considering responses to their proposed changes to national planning policy, the government have decided that one of the key lessons for improving our planning system – and increasing the supply of new homes – is for planning decisions to be made faster.
One of the first targets is “extension of time” agreements, the process whereby applicants agree with the local authority that they can have longer than the statutory 8 weeks (or 13 for major applications) in which to make a decision.
Use of such agreements has grown rapidly in recent years. While 88% of major applications are decided within the “agreed” time period, less than one in five are decided within 13 weeks.
Already registered? Login here
Stay at the forefront of thought leadership with news and analysis from award-winning journalists. Sign up below to receive:
It takes less than one minute….
… or subscribe for full access - Subscribe now